WillWill 1,5911010 silver badges66 bronze badges 3 Certainly, this would seem far more practical than relying on the default worth of an integer. I'll continue to keep this in mind. I am even now hoping to acquire my primary purpose Performing for all types, Whilst I just may perhaps resort to working with non-generic capabilities.A smartwatch is u

You cannot use void, but You should utilize object: it is actually somewhat inconvenience since your would-be-void capabilities ought to return null, but if it unifies your code, it ought to be a little rate to pay for.But should you mean that T are going to be recognised, just not statically, you'll want to generate equal of TypeReference dynamica